Contents
-
What Exactly Is an LED Screen Aging Test?
-
Key Differences Between the 72-Hour and 168-Hour Tests
-
How to Choose the Right Testing Duration for Different Projects
-
Why Testing Time Isn’t the Only Standard That Matters
-
How to Tell Whether a Manufacturer’s Aging Test Is Reliable
-
How Sostron Uses Testing to Guarantee Global Project Stability
The aging test is one of the most critical steps in determining LED screen reliability. A full 168-hour (7-day) high-load test can reveal deeper, hidden defects—making it ideal for demanding outdoor projects. Meanwhile, a 72-hour (3-day) test still ensures basic stability and helps accelerate delivery, making it suitable for time-sensitive applications. The right choice depends on your actual project scenario.
What Exactly Is an LED Screen Aging Test?
An LED aging test subjects modules to continuous high-load operation to accelerate the exposure of potential defects. In simple terms, it forces the LED modules to experience a “stress test” before they leave the factory—running them in simulated extreme conditions so any weak components fail early, not at the customer’s site.
The main purpose is to eliminate early-life failures. Industry statistics show that roughly 30% of LED display failures occur during the early use period, and many of these issues cannot be detected using standard quality checks. Through proper aging, failure rates can be reduced to below 0.1% (source: China Optics & Optoelectronics Manufacturers Association).
During the process, professional equipment applies 1.2× rated voltage stress to each module while monitoring 23 key parameters including temperature, brightness decay, and color consistency. In Sostron’s 15,000 m² smart factory in Shenzhen, a dedicated 2,000 m² temperature-controlled aging area equipped with a 24/7 monitoring system ensures every batch goes through rigorous screening.
Key Differences Between the 72-Hour and 168-Hour Tests
Comparison Overview
| Dimension | 72-Hour Test | 168-Hour Test |
|---|---|---|
| Ideal Use Case | Indoor fixed installations, short-term rental | Outdoor high-humidity or large-scale permanent installs |
| Early Failure Detection | ~75% of early-life defects | Up to 98% of early-life defects |
| Energy Consumption | Lower (~300 kWh per 1,000 modules) | Higher (~1,200 kWh per 1,000 modules) |
| Delivery Speed | Can shorten lead time to 5 days | Often requires at least 10 days |
| Typical Applications | Meeting room displays, small signage machines | Qatar royal wedding displays, Dubai outdoor screens |
The 72-hour test primarily exposes obvious problems such as cold solder joints or short circuits—ideal for rental projects where delivery time is tight.
The 168-hour test goes deeper, revealing chronic defects like chip slow-decay, capacitor aging, and long-term stability issues. This is why Sostron used the 168-hour method for the 691 m² triple-curve outdoor screen in New Cairo, Egypt.
A key detail: aging effects don’t increase linearly. Sostron’s R&D team found that Day 4–5 of the 168-hour cycle is the peak failure period, during which around 30% of hidden defects tend to show up. This is also why high-end clients—such as Ferrari’s Icona launch—require at least 168-hour aging reports from all suppliers.
How to Choose the Right Testing Duration
1. Outdoor Permanent Installations → 168 Hours Required
Take the Dubai transparent screen project: the region faces extreme summer temperatures of up to 50°C plus sandstorms. Sostron’s Crystal series passed the 168-hour test and additional high-/low-temperature shock cycling (-20°C to 60°C), ensuring stability under rapid environmental changes.
2. Indoor Rental Applications → 72 Hours Is Enough
For Sostron’s popular Hima rental series, lightweight 2.8 kg modules require frequent assembly and transportation. During the 72-hour test, Sostron adds vibration simulation to mimic transport conditions—ensuring reliability without slowing down rental turnover.
3. Special-Requirement Installations → Customized Testing
A high-end Japanese watch brand demanded exceptionally high color uniformity at low brightness. Sostron developed a dynamic brightness-cycling aging mode with a total duration of 120 hours—balancing display accuracy with delivery timelines.
Why Testing Time Isn’t the Only Standard
Temperature Control Matters Even More
Most manufacturers use standard room-temperature aging (around 25°C). Sostron instead uses 45°C constant-temperature aging. According to the Arrhenius model, every 10°C increase accelerates chemical reaction speed by 2–3×. This “temperature compensation” approach achieves the same aging effect in less time—shortening the testing cycle by up to 40% for certain products.
Load Conditions Determine Real Effectiveness
While typical manufacturers use static full-white screens for aging, Sostron tests with dynamic 4K video aging to simulate real-world stress. Comparative data shows this method detects 23% more abnormal pixels, which is one reason Sostron screens delivered zero failures at major events like the MIT Startup Competition.
Post-Aging Testing Is Just as Critical
After aging, Sostron performs complete parameter re-testing, checking:
-
Brightness decay (≤3%)
-
Color coordinate shift (ΔE ≤ 0.5)
-
Flatness (≤0.1 mm deviation)
…among 18 total metrics.
This test → repair → retest loop provides more meaningful quality assurance than simply extending aging time.
How to Tell Whether a Manufacturer’s Aging Test Is Reliable
1. Look for Full-Process Monitoring
Reputable manufacturers record voltage, temperature, alarms, and more throughout the aging cycle. Sostron’s self-developed CMS system automatically generates test reports—customers can scan a code to view full testing curves.
2. Check the Level of Equipment Investment
Aging tests require professional power supplies, temperature systems, and measurement tools—typically 15% of total production line investment.
Sostron’s 15,000 m² factory includes 12 fully automated aging lines, each capable of processing 500 m² per day—capacity small factories simply can’t match.
3. Review Real Project References
High-profile projects like the Qatar royal wedding or Ferrari Icona launch demand near-perfect reliability. Sostron’s ability to supply such events speaks for its testing standards. With 6,000+ projects across 70+ countries, its track record is the strongest proof of quality.
How Sostron Ensures Stable Performance Across Global Projects
Hardware: Independent-Zone Aging
Each cabinet features independent power and control units, allowing isolated aging testing. This method improved testing efficiency for the New Cairo 691 m² project by threefold, reflecting Sostron’s commitment to efficiency.
Software: Intelligent Aging Management
The self-developed system automatically adjusts parameters by model.
-
Ares outdoor series → 100% load
-
Reta indoor series → 80% load
This differentiated strategy enhances accuracy while reducing unnecessary energy use.
Service: Full Lifecycle Quality Traceability
Every Sostron LED module has a unique ID recording all manufacturing and aging data. Even years later, clients can access original test records via the CMS system—providing long-term peace of mind worldwide.
References:
